Compare
Head to head.
Choose robots to compare, or use the roster picker below. Spec-for-spec diff, Reality Score side-by-side, shareable URL.
Start with a guided matchup
Figure 02 vs Apollo→
Two factory pilots, very different transparency levels.
Atlas Electric vs Optimus Gen 2→
Verified robotics lab maturity versus manufacturing-scale ambition.
Neo vs Digit→
Home-first soft robotics versus warehouse-first biped logistics.
G1 vs H1→
Unitree's compact platform against its faster full-size humanoid.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Search by opening the menu, or keep using the roster picker below.
Quick read
XPENG Iron leads on more comparable public fields than PUDU D9. This is not a blanket verdict: missing values are treated as not sourceable, and Reality Score/lifecycle should be read alongside the spec rows.
PUDU D9 leads on
- Reality Score
XPENG Iron leads on
- Lifecycle
- DoF (total)
Specs
Spec
PUDU D9
XPENG Iron
Lifecycle
Prototype
Demo
Reality Score
51 / 100
40 / 100
Height
No sourceable public value for one side.
170 cm
No sourceable public value
Weight
No sourceable public value for one side.
65 kg
No sourceable public value
Payload
No sourceable public value for one side.
20 kg
No sourceable public value
Runtime
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Top speed
No sourceable public value for one side.
2 m/s
No sourceable public value
DoF (total)
42
82
DoF (per hand)
No sourceable public value for one side.
11
No sourceable public value
Actuator
Electric
Electric
Teleop
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Not publicly comparable.
Evidence
Evidence
PUDU D9
XPENG Iron
Public specs
Yes
Yes
Named customer
No
No
Independent verification
No
No
Teleop disclosure
No
No
Last reviewed
2026-06-06
2026-06-03
Source confidence
Source list published
Source list published